Thoughts from the trench - by Prakash Muralidharan

October 10, 2008

Nederlands/Dutch Français/French ???????/Russian Deutsch/German Italiano/Italian Português/Portuguese Español/Spanish ????????/Greek 日本語/Japanese 한국어/Korean 中文(简体)/Chinese Simplified 中文(简体)/Chinese Traditional

Setting SMART customer relationship goals

Filed under: Software Services, Client Management, Account Management, Selling, Pitching — Prakash Muralidharan @ 9:33 pm

Jonathan Farrington over at the "Sales and Sales Management" blog writes about the importance of having relationship objectives for large accounts:

"Everyone in the account team needs to know what we want the relationship to feel like."

Accounts, both large and small are all about relationships. Before relationships can be built and sustained, it is important to have clear and well defined relationship goals. These goals need to be SMART - Specific, Measurable, Actionable, Result oriented and Timely and most importantly, they need to be consistent with your larger account plan. 
 

Relationship value chain
Figure out where the money is headed:  You will have a much easier time selling if you know where the money is headed - even if you are a super confident, super smart, gunslinger salesman. So, talk to your coaches and figure out where the spending is headed- which lines of business (of the client), what buying centers, which technologies and whether the spending is discretionary or non-discretionary. Knowing these details is the first step towards "SMARTNESS". It is the foundation needed to make your relationship plan Specific (Which clients to target), Measurable (How to tangibly measure relationship success), Actionable (Having an operational plan to 'actionize'), Result oriented (Ensuring relationship goals translate into revenue), Timely (Your targets are time bound, can your relationship plan be otherwise?).

Map out your relationship value chain: Now that you are done playing Sherlock Holmes, it's time to dive deeper. Knowing where the money is headed allows you to break down your overall revenue target into more detailed sub-account level numbers. It also lets you know how much can possibly be "mined" from existing buying centers and how much needs to be "hunted" from new areas. 

A single line of business might have multiple, distinct buying centers. This distinction is important as your relationship plan for a given line of business needs to align with these specific and distinct buying centers. The way the IT division that servers the treasury department of a bank ("Treasury" line of business for you) buys a consulting project might be completely different from the way it buys production support. You need to map out the relationship value chain for each buying centre that you need to engage with. By "relationship value chain" I mean mapping out the user buyer, the economic buyer, the technical buyer, influencers and gatekeepers. You can have the same person on the client side playing multiple roles, but knowing who is wearing which hat is critical. A very basic relationship value chain could look like this:

 Economic buyersTechnical buyersUser BuyersInfluencersGatekeepers
LOB -1 Consulting<<Customer names>>
Application Development
Application Support


Very good. You now know your financial goals, have mapped these goals into the client's context and have laid out your relationship value chain for each buying centre. It's now time to see where you want to go versus where you currently are.   

Relationship gap analysis: 'Customer relationships' are sometimes thought of as just a measure of how friendly or open the customer is with you. I mean you as an individual. While the "feel" part is important, in my view, relationships go much beyond just the way it feels. The "feel" part draws heavily on you, the individual, but remember that the customer is having a relationship with your company and you are merely a conduit. Hence, it is important to view relationships more holistically. The current state of the relationship with a given customer can be judged by what she:
a). Says about your company
b). Feels about your company
c). Thinks about your company
These factors ultimately decide what the customer is willing to do for you!
You might have never done business with a certain customer, but rest assured that she will have something to say, think and feel about you. Maybe she thinks you are a horrible company because her best friend at her previous job had a bad experience with you. It is your job to change that perception!

For each buying center, map out where the stakeholders in the relationship value chain are and where you need them to be. Are they saying the 'right' things about you? Keep in mind the importance of which service line you are trying to sell and what kind of perceptions would help you sell this. If you are selling consulting, obviously, you would like people to think of your company as a thought leader rather than an executor. In fact, having an "great executor" image could hurt here.    
      
Operational Plan: Once you have figured out the relationship gaps, it is important to work towards rectifying the same. It's helps to have specific actions to be taken at 30 day, 60 day and 90 day intervals that would move you closer to your relationship goals. If you need to change what a certain customer thinks about you from "Great executor" to "Thought leader" each action in your plan needs to hit this theme consistently and you need to add value constantly. This could be something like getting the customer to attend a seminar hosted by your company, or getting your consulting team to do a free two hour session on Industry best practices. The operational plan ensures your goals are Measurable, Actionable, Result oriented and Timely.  Any operational plan to fill relationship gaps can succeed as long as there is a focus on giving value to the customer at all times.


Linking and Sharing

If you found this page useful, consider linking to it.
Simply copy and paste the code below into your web site (Ctrl+C to copy)
It will look like this: Setting SMART customer relationship goals

del.icio.us:Setting SMART customer relationship goals  digg:Setting SMART customer relationship goals  fark:Setting SMART customer relationship goals
Trackback

Trackback URI for this entry:

http://www.prakashonsoftware.org/blog/index.php/2008/10/10/setting-smart-customer-relationship-goals/trackback/

July 21, 2007

Nederlands/Dutch Français/French ???????/Russian Deutsch/German Italiano/Italian Português/Portuguese Español/Spanish ????????/Greek 日本語/Japanese 한국어/Korean 中文(简体)/Chinese Simplified 中文(简体)/Chinese Traditional

Customer Delight: The importance of the unstated!

Filed under: Software Services, Marketing, Client Management — Prakash Muralidharan @ 1:49 pm

Key to Customer delight : The unstated


Linking and Sharing

If you found this page useful, consider linking to it.
Simply copy and paste the code below into your web site (Ctrl+C to copy)
It will look like this: Customer Delight: The importance of the unstated!

del.icio.us:Customer Delight: The importance of the unstated!   digg:Customer Delight: The importance of the unstated!   fark:Customer Delight: The importance of the unstated!
Trackback

Trackback URI for this entry:

http://www.prakashonsoftware.org/blog/index.php/2007/07/21/customer-delight-the-importance-of-the-unstated/trackback/

March 13, 2007

Nederlands/Dutch Français/French ???????/Russian Deutsch/German Italiano/Italian Português/Portuguese Español/Spanish ????????/Greek 日本語/Japanese 한국어/Korean 中文(简体)/Chinese Simplified 中文(简体)/Chinese Traditional

LinkedIn versus Orkut

Filed under: Software Services, Consumer Internet, Marketing — Prakash Muralidharan @ 3:21 pm
I recently signed up with LinkedIn and Orkut in an attempt to connect with long lost friends and colleagues. Both seem pretty successful and I did a comparative run on Google Trends and here's what I got:


Blue : LinkedIn
Red : Orkut



Orkut a mainstream social networking site gets hell of a lot more search volume, while LinkedIn, a niche business networking site, inspite of it's inferior search statistics manages at times, to upstage Orkut in news reference volume! What do you make out of these statistics ?

Note : Google cautions " Google Trends aims to provide insights into broad search patterns. As a Google Labs product, it is still in the early stages of development. Also, it is based upon just a portion of our searches, and several approximations are used when computing your results. Please keep this in mind when using it. "


Linking and Sharing

If you found this page useful, consider linking to it.
Simply copy and paste the code below into your web site (Ctrl+C to copy)
It will look like this: LinkedIn versus Orkut

del.icio.us:LinkedIn versus Orkut  digg:LinkedIn versus Orkut  fark:LinkedIn versus Orkut
Trackback

Trackback URI for this entry:

http://www.prakashonsoftware.org/blog/index.php/2007/03/13/linkedin-versus-orkut/trackback/

February 18, 2007

Nederlands/Dutch Français/French ???????/Russian Deutsch/German Italiano/Italian Português/Portuguese Español/Spanish ????????/Greek 日本語/Japanese 한국어/Korean 中文(简体)/Chinese Simplified 中文(简体)/Chinese Traditional

Web 2.0 : Marketing tool or market destroying tool ?

Filed under: Web2.0, Marketing — Prakash Muralidharan @ 2:30 am
Paul Gilin calls upon CIO's to use Web 2.0 tools to "sell" their ideas internally. William Hewitt, CMO of Novell, feels "It's not just the blog itself, but the whole notion of enhanced collaboration with your customers."

I feel this whole notion of collaboration, staying networked with your customers and letting them network with each other is a double edged sword. It works great if you have a great product that you want to let the whole world know about, but if your product sucks and only a few customers know about it, Web 2.0 will spread the word faster and with more credibility. Get naked if you want to, but make sure you look like a hollywood star!      

Linking and Sharing

If you found this page useful, consider linking to it.
Simply copy and paste the code below into your web site (Ctrl+C to copy)
It will look like this: Web 2.0 : Marketing tool or market destroying tool ?

del.icio.us:Web 2.0 : Marketing tool or market destroying tool ?  digg:Web 2.0 : Marketing tool or market destroying tool ?  fark:Web 2.0 : Marketing tool or market destroying tool ?
Trackback

Trackback URI for this entry:

http://www.prakashonsoftware.org/blog/index.php/2007/02/18/web-20-marketing-tool-or-market-destroying-tool/trackback/

Creative Commons LicenseDisclaimer : This blog site is published by and reflects the personal views of Prakash Muralidharan,in his individual capacity. It does not necessarily represent the views of any of his employers, past or present, and is not sponsored or endorsed by any of them. No representation is made about the accuracy of the information contained in this blog.