Thoughts from the trench - by Prakash Muralidharan

October 10, 2008

Nederlands/Dutch Français/French ???????/Russian Deutsch/German Italiano/Italian Português/Portuguese Español/Spanish ????????/Greek 日本語/Japanese 한국어/Korean 中文(简体)/Chinese Simplified 中文(简体)/Chinese Traditional

Setting SMART customer relationship goals

Filed under: Software Services, Client Management, Account Management, Selling, Pitching — Prakash Muralidharan @ 9:33 pm

Jonathan Farrington over at the "Sales and Sales Management" blog writes about the importance of having relationship objectives for large accounts:

"Everyone in the account team needs to know what we want the relationship to feel like."

Accounts, both large and small are all about relationships. Before relationships can be built and sustained, it is important to have clear and well defined relationship goals. These goals need to be SMART - Specific, Measurable, Actionable, Result oriented and Timely and most importantly, they need to be consistent with your larger account plan. 
 

Relationship value chain
Figure out where the money is headed:  You will have a much easier time selling if you know where the money is headed - even if you are a super confident, super smart, gunslinger salesman. So, talk to your coaches and figure out where the spending is headed- which lines of business (of the client), what buying centers, which technologies and whether the spending is discretionary or non-discretionary. Knowing these details is the first step towards "SMARTNESS". It is the foundation needed to make your relationship plan Specific (Which clients to target), Measurable (How to tangibly measure relationship success), Actionable (Having an operational plan to 'actionize'), Result oriented (Ensuring relationship goals translate into revenue), Timely (Your targets are time bound, can your relationship plan be otherwise?).

Map out your relationship value chain: Now that you are done playing Sherlock Holmes, it's time to dive deeper. Knowing where the money is headed allows you to break down your overall revenue target into more detailed sub-account level numbers. It also lets you know how much can possibly be "mined" from existing buying centers and how much needs to be "hunted" from new areas. 

A single line of business might have multiple, distinct buying centers. This distinction is important as your relationship plan for a given line of business needs to align with these specific and distinct buying centers. The way the IT division that servers the treasury department of a bank ("Treasury" line of business for you) buys a consulting project might be completely different from the way it buys production support. You need to map out the relationship value chain for each buying centre that you need to engage with. By "relationship value chain" I mean mapping out the user buyer, the economic buyer, the technical buyer, influencers and gatekeepers. You can have the same person on the client side playing multiple roles, but knowing who is wearing which hat is critical. A very basic relationship value chain could look like this:

 Economic buyersTechnical buyersUser BuyersInfluencersGatekeepers
LOB -1 Consulting<<Customer names>>
Application Development
Application Support


Very good. You now know your financial goals, have mapped these goals into the client's context and have laid out your relationship value chain for each buying centre. It's now time to see where you want to go versus where you currently are.   

Relationship gap analysis: 'Customer relationships' are sometimes thought of as just a measure of how friendly or open the customer is with you. I mean you as an individual. While the "feel" part is important, in my view, relationships go much beyond just the way it feels. The "feel" part draws heavily on you, the individual, but remember that the customer is having a relationship with your company and you are merely a conduit. Hence, it is important to view relationships more holistically. The current state of the relationship with a given customer can be judged by what she:
a). Says about your company
b). Feels about your company
c). Thinks about your company
These factors ultimately decide what the customer is willing to do for you!
You might have never done business with a certain customer, but rest assured that she will have something to say, think and feel about you. Maybe she thinks you are a horrible company because her best friend at her previous job had a bad experience with you. It is your job to change that perception!

For each buying center, map out where the stakeholders in the relationship value chain are and where you need them to be. Are they saying the 'right' things about you? Keep in mind the importance of which service line you are trying to sell and what kind of perceptions would help you sell this. If you are selling consulting, obviously, you would like people to think of your company as a thought leader rather than an executor. In fact, having an "great executor" image could hurt here.    
      
Operational Plan: Once you have figured out the relationship gaps, it is important to work towards rectifying the same. It's helps to have specific actions to be taken at 30 day, 60 day and 90 day intervals that would move you closer to your relationship goals. If you need to change what a certain customer thinks about you from "Great executor" to "Thought leader" each action in your plan needs to hit this theme consistently and you need to add value constantly. This could be something like getting the customer to attend a seminar hosted by your company, or getting your consulting team to do a free two hour session on Industry best practices. The operational plan ensures your goals are Measurable, Actionable, Result oriented and Timely.  Any operational plan to fill relationship gaps can succeed as long as there is a focus on giving value to the customer at all times.


Linking and Sharing

If you found this page useful, consider linking to it.
Simply copy and paste the code below into your web site (Ctrl+C to copy)
It will look like this: Setting SMART customer relationship goals

del.icio.us:Setting SMART customer relationship goals  digg:Setting SMART customer relationship goals  fark:Setting SMART customer relationship goals
Trackback

Trackback URI for this entry:

http://www.prakashonsoftware.org/blog/index.php/2008/10/10/setting-smart-customer-relationship-goals/trackback/

September 23, 2008

Nederlands/Dutch Français/French ???????/Russian Deutsch/German Italiano/Italian Português/Portuguese Español/Spanish ????????/Greek 日本語/Japanese 한국어/Korean 中文(简体)/Chinese Simplified 中文(简体)/Chinese Traditional

Selling a price increase.

Filed under: Account Management, Selling, Pitching — Prakash Muralidharan @ 11:44 pm
Mark Hunter has an interesting view on selling price increases:

"A price increase must always be sold to two people.  Not only does the person buying the product / service need to be conviced, but also (and more importantly) the salesperson doing the selling."

He goes on to say that sales lost as a result of the price increase maybe because of poor questioning rather than the price increase itself: "they lost sales because they didn’t ask enough questions to fully establish the customers’ needs."

Seth drops a bomb shell when he says "No such thing as price pressure".

Linking and Sharing

If you found this page useful, consider linking to it.
Simply copy and paste the code below into your web site (Ctrl+C to copy)
It will look like this: Selling a price increase.

del.icio.us:Selling a price increase.  digg:Selling a price increase.  fark:Selling a price increase.
Trackback

Trackback URI for this entry:

http://www.prakashonsoftware.org/blog/index.php/2008/09/23/selling-a-price-increase/trackback/

Nederlands/Dutch Français/French ???????/Russian Deutsch/German Italiano/Italian Português/Portuguese Español/Spanish ????????/Greek 日本語/Japanese 한국어/Korean 中文(简体)/Chinese Simplified 中文(简体)/Chinese Traditional

What image does your customer have of you?

Filed under: Account Management, Selling, Pitching — Prakash Muralidharan @ 12:26 am

Seth blogs about the importance of intagibles- those things that have no numerical value but are priceless- enthusiasm, speed, peer pressure and generosity.

One of the intangibles in selling software services especially within an account (farming as oppossed to hunting) is 'image'. What does the customer think about you? At one end, he can think of you as a thought leader who can be relied on for ideas. At the other end, you might be seen as a great executor who can get things done. He can see you as a flexible partner who understands him and is willing to work through problems patiently. Or does your customer see you as an able and strong willed "Rottweiler" type personality? No one image works for all situations and neither can one be a chameleon, switching colors at the drop of a hat. It is however helpful to know one's natural style and then be prepared to flex depending on the context. You can even choose people in your team who can complement your natural image! Here are my thoughts:

What image works in your situation? I'd love to hear.


Linking and Sharing

If you found this page useful, consider linking to it.
Simply copy and paste the code below into your web site (Ctrl+C to copy)
It will look like this: What image does your customer have of you?

del.icio.us:What image does your customer have of you?  digg:What image does your customer have of you?  fark:What image does your customer have of you?
Trackback

Trackback URI for this entry:

http://www.prakashonsoftware.org/blog/index.php/2008/09/23/what-image-does-your-customer-have-of-you/trackback/

September 18, 2008

Nederlands/Dutch Français/French ???????/Russian Deutsch/German Italiano/Italian Português/Portuguese Español/Spanish ????????/Greek 日本語/Japanese 한국어/Korean 中文(简体)/Chinese Simplified 中文(简体)/Chinese Traditional

Playing to win. Each time. Every time.

Filed under: Software Services, Account Management, Selling, Pitching — Prakash Muralidharan @ 9:23 pm

Brad Trnavsky drives home the importance of expecting to win in every interaction you have with the customer. "If you are picking up the phone and saying to yourself 'I hope this works out' or 'all these leads suck there is no way I am going to schedule an appointment' guess what??? You WON’T schedule an appointment!"

I can't agree more. Selling is tough especially in these times. The fact is you are likely to loose more interactions than you will win. But you never know at the outset how an interaction will end up. This means you need to play to win every time. That can be hard. Here are some ways to motivate yourself to always play to win.

Make relationships an end in itself: We all focus on building relationships. You can't be in sales in this industry if you don't. But we often end up seeing relationships as a means to an end. 'Let me build a great relationship so that I can get more business'. Sounds great, but you end up building only those relationships that you think will lead to business and the fact is you don't. People get transferred, budgets and priorities change and yes, even the Cowboys can get beaten. Build relationships does not have to be a chore. Guy has a great post on
building relationships. Making relationships an end in itself will not only improve your numbers, but also keep you pepped up because you get that 'Yeees!' feeling even when you don't sign an SOW.

Examine your own negative thoughts: Next time you think "This is not going to work. She's not going to give me any business", go a level deeper and ask yourself why exactly you think so. You'll be pleasantly surprised that you often have preconceived notions or mental projections that are holding you back- projections that have little to do with reality on the ground.

Think non linear: Before you condemn an upcoming interaction as a 'waste of time', think of what good can possibly come from the interaction. In what ways besides you immediate goal can you leverage the relationship? This could be work related or it might just be plain fun. But thinking non linear can surely enrich your interaction and make it more fun. That way even when you don't get business you will still be having fun. Catching a football game with a client who cannot give you business is a good example.



Think lifetime value: View the folks you sell to as 'clients' and not as 'customers'. Paul McCord has a great post on the difference. Think of what value you can leverage from the relationship five years from now, ten years from now. Not convinced? If you are age thirty or above, make a list of five people who were your peers when you started your career. See where they are now and how they could have helped you today. The fact is you can never predict the lifetime value of a relationship, but you can rest assured that lifetime value in many of your immediate relationships is immense. Think long term and you won't be flustered or beaten down by short term setbacks. 


Linking and Sharing

If you found this page useful, consider linking to it.
Simply copy and paste the code below into your web site (Ctrl+C to copy)
It will look like this: Playing to win. Each time. Every time.

del.icio.us:Playing to win. Each time. Every time.  digg:Playing to win. Each time. Every time.  fark:Playing to win. Each time. Every time.
Trackback

Trackback URI for this entry:

http://www.prakashonsoftware.org/blog/index.php/2008/09/18/playing-to-win-each-time-every-time/trackback/

September 14, 2008

Nederlands/Dutch Français/French ???????/Russian Deutsch/German Italiano/Italian Português/Portuguese Español/Spanish ????????/Greek 日本語/Japanese 한국어/Korean 中文(简体)/Chinese Simplified 中文(简体)/Chinese Traditional

Handling irate customers.

Filed under: Software Services, Client Management, Account Management, Selling — Prakash Muralidharan @ 12:13 am

 

Does your customer make you feel like you are Derek Anderson up against the Dallas Cowboy's Defensive line?  Those who watched last week's royal thumping of the Browns would know what I mean.

Delivery is failing-repeatedly. Resourcing is pathetic- universal problem eh? All the "salesy" commitments you made to get the deal are coming back to haunt you. The customer has stopped a payment and the whole world is baying for your blood. What do you do?

Don't react but validate: It's Monday morning and you are getting ready to go to work. Your cell phone rings and it is the customer.
You: "Hi Laks, How are you ?"
Customer: " I can be better. I just got a call from your project manager that he needs one more week to complete the system testing. The worst thing is that he is blaming it on our SME's! You know how much is at stake here? The business will kill me."
You: "Let me explain Laks. Actually, what happened was that John, your SME went on leave and this lead to…"
Customer, cutting in: "This is RIDICULOUS! I am calling the CIO right now".  

What went wrong? You were actually right. The SME did go on leave and the requirements review did not happen. That indeed was the root cause. On top of it, your offshore team has been working weekends. An escalation is an escalation even if it is unfair.

When you get a complaint, especially when it is on the phone. Don't react or explain. First validate the feelings the customer is experiencing and ask for a meeting. This is not the same as agreeing that you are at fault. Saying something like.."I understand what you are saying. The delivery has slipped and this situation is not acceptable. If I were in your place, I would be just as upset. Can we meet first thing in the morning, at say 8 am and talk about this? I want to make sure this is resolved immediately." By validating the customer's feelings and by giving a commitment to solve the problem you are a). Making sure the relationship is intact - at least for now. b). Ensuring that the buck stops with you. c). Have given the emotional customer the psychological air that he so deperately needs at that time. However, if you had stayed the course of pure logic, you could end up winning the argument but spoiling the relationship. 

Meet the customer face to face: Go into the meeting with an attitude that this is "my" problem to solve. Set the tone of the meeting by showing that you are ready to own the problem, no matter what you think is the root cause. You might be a small cog in a billion dollar company. But act like you own the place. Once you have set the right tone with your openess, ask the right questions. Focus the questions on identifying the root of the problem from the customer's perspective - not your perspective. Continue to validate what the customer is feeling. You will see him opening up and becoming more receptive to you. Once you see this happening, ask the questions that will help you find the root cause from your company's perspective. Armed with this information, end the meeting with a promise to come back with a solution.

Do a deep dive: Call a meeting with all the key people from your team. Set the tone that this is a problem that the team needs to own. Ensure that the team understands that while they need to own the problem, the solution can be a joint one with the customer. Before sharing the customer's perspective, ask the team for their own perspective. Don't forget to give them the psychological air that you gave the customer. You might end up uncovering hidden issues and problems. Encourage the team to come up with creative solution options that not only solve the immediate problem, but address the root cause. Ensure that any actions are documented and owned by the project manager and not by anyone else.

Circle back with the customer: Go back and share the solution options with the customer. Always project the solution as a joint one. This is because almost always there is something that the customer can do to help you do your work better. Share your action plan and ask for feedback. Document the actions in a mail and always follow up to check if the actions have had the desired result. 

Note of thanks: Drop a note of thanks to the customer for giving you this chance to improve the service. Ensure that all actions and commitments - on both sides are documented.
   

BTW, If you are a Browns fan you can take solace that you have me for company. Let's hope they do something better when they visit the Steelers.


Linking and Sharing

If you found this page useful, consider linking to it.
Simply copy and paste the code below into your web site (Ctrl+C to copy)
It will look like this: Handling irate customers.

del.icio.us:Handling irate customers.  digg:Handling irate customers.  fark:Handling irate customers.
Trackback

Trackback URI for this entry:

http://www.prakashonsoftware.org/blog/index.php/2008/09/14/handling-irate-customers/trackback/

September 3, 2008

Nederlands/Dutch Français/French ???????/Russian Deutsch/German Italiano/Italian Português/Portuguese Español/Spanish ????????/Greek 日本語/Japanese 한국어/Korean 中文(简体)/Chinese Simplified 中文(简体)/Chinese Traditional

Vendor agnosticism, revenue stability and understanding your client’s spend.

Filed under: Software Services, Outsourcing, Account Management — Prakash Muralidharan @ 11:26 pm
I recently wrote about Gartner's market position as a firm whose core asset is proprietary content. Dave Eckert and Carter Lusher classify analyst firms into those that are end user centric (like Gartner) and those that are vendor centric (like the Yankee group). Duncan Chappel lays out the relationship between analyst relations organizations (AR) and the vendor centric analyst firms: "Different analysts generate very different percentages of their revenues from AR managers. Many analyst firms generate a lot of revenue from vendors, but not all of that revenue is from AR managers or from the rest of the vendor marketing organisation. Some analyst firms are mainly engages in vendor-funded research projects which supports the vendors’ marketing operation. A firm like Quocirca, for example, generates 99% of its revenue from vendors, and much of that is perceptual research which vendors commission to develop their marketing."

Vendor agnosticism does seems to add a modicum of revenue stability for analyst firms. Those that try to provide unique insight into solving business problems seem to do better than those that make a living supporting marketing programs of specific vendors.

The software services business does have it's parallels. During the dot com boom, fly by night web consultancies flourished and "e-business verticals" blossomed in larger companies. These organizations had competencies around putting up websites quickly - a decent competency to have, but made the mistake of focussing only on small and mid market high velocity startups. The going was good as long as there was venture money to feed the frenzy. Traditional outsourcing companies did not get the fantastic valuations that some of these more flashy vendors commanded, but based their revenues on more mundane bread and butter application development and maintenance activities. Unglamorous but stable. 

All this leads us to examine the importance of understanding how your client spends her IT dollars. What typically gets funded during a recession? What gets yanked off the table? How should you customize your pitch during a recession? Should you change the relationship mapping to make it more operational during a recession? Food for thought!


Linking and Sharing

If you found this page useful, consider linking to it.
Simply copy and paste the code below into your web site (Ctrl+C to copy)
It will look like this: Vendor agnosticism, revenue stability and understanding your client's spend.

del.icio.us:Vendor agnosticism, revenue stability and understanding your client's spend.  digg:Vendor agnosticism, revenue stability and understanding your client's spend.  fark:Vendor agnosticism, revenue stability and understanding your client's spend.
Trackback

Trackback URI for this entry:

http://www.prakashonsoftware.org/blog/index.php/2008/09/03/vendor-agnosticism-revenue-stability-and-understanding-your-clients-spend/trackback/

August 17, 2008

Nederlands/Dutch Français/French ???????/Russian Deutsch/German Italiano/Italian Português/Portuguese Español/Spanish ????????/Greek 日本語/Japanese 한국어/Korean 中文(简体)/Chinese Simplified 中文(简体)/Chinese Traditional

The importance of being the first to give value

Filed under: Client Management, Account Management — Prakash Muralidharan @ 1:31 pm

Account management is all about relationships. You can deliver all you want, but if relationships are messed up, it's time to polish the resume- guaranteed. You will get big time escalations over little things. Well ? Did someone say that the little things are the big things when it comes to relationships ?

In some ways it is funny. Relationships, something essentially emotional, should play such an important part in selling something that is thought to be a product of logic. In any type of a complex sale, relationships play a key factor. In account management; it's everything.

OK. Relationships are everything. So how does one go about building them ? One of the keys to building lasting customer relationships is to be the first to give value and to keep giving value without expecting anything in return. Find out what matters to your customer and think of small, incremental and creative ways to deliver the same. Your delivery style should be open, friendly and engaging. Do this, and you are well on your way to building lasting relationships.


Linking and Sharing

If you found this page useful, consider linking to it.
Simply copy and paste the code below into your web site (Ctrl+C to copy)
It will look like this: The importance of being the first to give value

del.icio.us:The importance of being the first to give value  digg:The importance of being the first to give value  fark:The importance of being the first to give value
Trackback

Trackback URI for this entry:

http://www.prakashonsoftware.org/blog/index.php/2008/08/17/the-importance-of-being-the-first-to-give-value/trackback/

August 9, 2008

Nederlands/Dutch Français/French ???????/Russian Deutsch/German Italiano/Italian Português/Portuguese Español/Spanish ????????/Greek 日本語/Japanese 한국어/Korean 中文(简体)/Chinese Simplified 中文(简体)/Chinese Traditional

Does your client think you are a strategic offshore partner ?

Filed under: Software Services, Account Management — Prakash Muralidharan @ 12:05 am

Stephen Lane blogs about outsourcing maturity and talks about creating strategic partnerships with a select group of vendors. From a vendor perspective, what does it mean to be a 'strategic partner'?  'We are your partners' is a much bandied about phrase in software services circles. Short of giving their right arm, vendors would do anything to get the client to call them 'partners'. Believe me, the word 'partner' can be a loaded one. It can mean anything from being a whipping boy to a trusted advisor. Here's are ten questions that could help you figure out where you stand on the partnership continuum.   

-How good is your price realization ? Do your fixed price contracts often run into trouble with payments in spite of decent delivery ?

-Do you get to shape needs or do you get resource requirements conveyed to you ?

-Does the client ask for your opinion in matters that concern outsourcing ?

-Are you executing around well defined SLA's ?

-When you make a mistake, does the client show you the contract, or does he work for a win-win solution ? When the client slips up, is it a negotiated win-win or are contracts conveniently forgotten ?

-Does the CIO and her direct reports give you access ?

-Do you know what the forward looking twelve month business plan for your customer looks like ?

-Can you name the top five strategic initiatives in your client's business ? Have you met the executives who run these programs in the last one month ?

-How good is the demand pipeline visibility ? Do you know with a fair amount of confidence what your revenue run rate will be at the start of a quarter ?

-What is your share of wallet compared to the competition ?

The fact is that not every client wants you to be a 'strategic partner'. But it does help to know where you figure. 


Linking and Sharing

If you found this page useful, consider linking to it.
Simply copy and paste the code below into your web site (Ctrl+C to copy)
It will look like this: Does your client think you are a strategic offshore partner ?

del.icio.us:Does your client think you are a strategic offshore partner ?  digg:Does your client think you are a strategic offshore partner ?  fark:Does your client think you are a strategic offshore partner ?
Trackback

Trackback URI for this entry:

http://www.prakashonsoftware.org/blog/index.php/2008/08/09/does-your-client-think-you-are-a-strategic-offshore-partner/trackback/

July 13, 2008

Nederlands/Dutch Français/French ???????/Russian Deutsch/German Italiano/Italian Português/Portuguese Español/Spanish ????????/Greek 日本語/Japanese 한국어/Korean 中文(简体)/Chinese Simplified 中文(简体)/Chinese Traditional

The nature of demand for software services.

Filed under: Software Services, Strategy, Client Management, Account Management, Pitching — Prakash Muralidharan @ 3:49 pm

A salesman's job is to shape needs and generate demand. With the economy in recession, many clients are cutting budgets. Prabhu says there is evidence that budgets are getting halved in several industries. Demand seems to be either stagnant or is taking a nosedive.
     Talking of demand, there have been very different times too. Most people of my generation (read oldies!) have seen the Y2K boom followed by the rollercoaster dot com era - dog food selling websites getting valued at billions and then getting dumped at values lower than even their tiny dog food inventories would command. The dot com era also saw the demand for skills like 'digital strategy'. You could download a few articles on B2B and B2C and take a month rehashing them into a nice looking ppt titled 'Monetizing Eyeballs', replete with clouds and arrows and bill at $250/hr while you are at it. Oh! Did I mention fat perdiems ?
      Most attempts to understand demand are done from a vendor's perspective. Starting with staff aug and ending with consulting. Co-sourcing and managed services bring up the middle. 
Makes perfect sense. The only problem I have is that this is a very inward way of looking at demand, it's demand from a vendor perspective. The client simply does not think on these lines. From a client's perspective, there are two broad classes of demand a). Steady state demand (SSD)-The keep-the-lights-on part that is responsible for keeping the business running and b). Transformational demand (TD) that seeks to change the business. Steady state demand, while being unglamorous, provides much the needed revenue stability that comes with an annuity business. It allows you to meet your numbers, build operational relationships and acts as a backbone during tough times. Transformational demand has peaks and troughs, is sometimes based on the whim and fancy of client execs. Tapping into transformational demand needs a different style of engagement, centered on thought leadership and the business domain. It demands that you take a point of view when you talk to customers instead of just asking them "I have great people with me. How can I help ? ". What makes transformational demand most critical is that today's TD is tommorrow's SSD. Here are some key differences between the two streams of demand and some thoughts on how to engage.

 Steady state demandTransformational demand
Demand VisibilityTypically of an annuity nature and has long term visibility. Visibility is often tied to related transformational initiatives.Visibility depends on the level of client engagement. Lower levels of engagement limited to operational staff renders poor visibility while a strategic engagement approach leads to much higher visibility.
Demand VolatilityLow to medium volatility compared to transformational demand. Downturn in budgets could see positive or negative spikes depending on the client's propensity to right size his own IT organization.Highly volatile as demand is often discretionary. Economic cycles drive budgets and spending. Clients often prefer to have a greater proportion of internal staff do the work.
Strategic importanceAdds revenue predictability and acts as a backbone during lean times. Helps build strong operational relationships.Best way and often the only way to dislodge a deeply entrenched SSD competitor. TD manifests as future SSD.
How to Pitch ?Commit productivity improvements year on year and lock up demand in the form of multi year annuity contracts.Do not focus on cost or productivity as a value. Instead, demonstrate thought leadership through a 360 degree approach encompassing domain, people, processes and technology. Key message :"You are at point A now, but need to be at point B and here is how we can take you there".
What the client looks for in a partner ?Flexibility and demonstrated value that goes beyond cost arbitrage.Thought leadership and business value.
Keys to shaping demandEarly entry into the sales cycle. Strong operational relationships and the ability to link cost savings through offshoring in SSD to investments in TD.Strong strategic relationships and the ability to lead the thought process.

What are your thoughts and experiences with various demand streams ?


     


Linking and Sharing

If you found this page useful, consider linking to it.
Simply copy and paste the code below into your web site (Ctrl+C to copy)
It will look like this: The nature of demand for software services.

del.icio.us:The nature of demand for software services.  digg:The nature of demand for software services.  fark:The nature of demand for software services.
Trackback

Trackback URI for this entry:

http://www.prakashonsoftware.org/blog/index.php/2008/07/13/the-nature-of-demand-for-software-services/trackback/

February 9, 2008

Nederlands/Dutch Français/French ???????/Russian Deutsch/German Italiano/Italian Português/Portuguese Español/Spanish ????????/Greek 日本語/Japanese 한국어/Korean 中文(简体)/Chinese Simplified 中文(简体)/Chinese Traditional

Clothes make the man-An executive summary makes a proposal

Filed under: Software Services, Client Management, Account Management, Selling — Prakash Muralidharan @ 2:47 am
"Clothes make the man" said Mark Twain. A great executive summary can makes a good proposal look great. An EC is intended for the executive, the decision maker. It's a summary of what you have to say for the executive. A good executive summary should in under 60 seconds convey the value proposition in such a way as to pique executive inte